哲心融合平台家庭教育知识库
首页 / 资料库 / 正文

The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.

原文摘录 · 研究摘要约 4 分钟

正文

Background The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) is one of the world's oldest nationwide hospital registries and is used extensively for research. Many studies have validated algorithms for identifying health events in the DNPR, but the reports are fragmented and no overview exists. Objectives To review the content, data quality, and research potential of the DNPR. Methods We examined the setting, history, aims, content, and classification systems of the DNPR. We searched PubMed and the Danish Medical Journal to create a bibliography of validation studies. We included also studies that were referenced in retrieved papers or known to us beforehand. Methodological considerations related to DNPR data were reviewed. Results During 1977-2012, the DNPR registered 8,085,603 persons, accounting for 7,268,857 inpatient, 5,953,405 outpatient, and 5,097,300 emergency department contacts. The DNPR provides nationwide longitudinal registration of detailed administrative and clinical data. It has recorded information on all patients discharged from Danish nonpsychiatric hospitals since 1977 and on psychiatric inpatients and emergency department and outpatient specialty clinic contacts since 1995. For each patient contact, one primary and optional secondary diagnoses are recorded according to the International Classification of Diseases. The DNPR provides a data source to identify diseases, examinations, certain in-hospital medical treatments, and surgical procedures. Long-term temporal trends in hospitalization and treatment rates can be studied. The positive predictive values of diseases and treatments vary widely ( Conclusion The DNPR is a valuable tool for epidemiological research. However, both its strengths and limitations must be considered when interpreting research results, and continuous validation of its clinical data is essential.

来源

Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT.. (2015). DOI: 10.2147/clep.s91125. 许可:cc by-nc。摘要为原文,未做 AI 改写。

检索链接

标签

ADHD 家庭,开放获取,研究摘要,非AI

分类

原文摘录 · 研究摘要

本文部分内容由 AI 辅助生成并人工整理;仅供学习参考,不构成心理诊断或治疗建议。引文如标注「待核验」,请勿直接引用。
内容类型原文摘录 / 资料摘要
来源Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT.. (2015). DOI: 10.2147/clep.s91125. 许可:cc by-nc。摘要为原文,未做 AI 改写。
审校状态原文条目在来源中注明出处与许可;摘要类条目未逐条核验;研究摘要为英文原文,未做 AI 改写